[Answered] PHIL347N Week 4 Discussion: Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 8, 9, 17 (Introduction)
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)

Click on the following tabs to review the concepts that will be addressed in this activity:

A valid structure is the way in which an argument is put together that assures it will pass the test of logical strength.

The Basic Structure of Deductive and Inductive Arguments
Click on the following links to view argument examples:

Link: Deductive Argument Example
Link: Inductive Argument

Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, address the following:

  • Find and post examples of deductive and inductive arguments.
  • For each example, evaluate its logical strength, using the concepts and ideas presented in the textbook readings, the lesson, and any other source you find that helps you to evaluate the validity (deductive) or strength (inductive) of the argument. You can use examples from the text, or you can find examples elsewhere.
    • Editorials and opinion columns are a good source, as are letters to the editor. Blogs will also often be based on arguments.
    • Use mapping and evaluative techniques to make sure it is an argument.
  • Is it inductive or deductive? Explain why.
  • Does it pass the tests of validity and strength? Explain.

Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least two peers or one peer and the instructor. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification. Do you agree with their analysis – be very specific about why you agree or disagree.

Writing Requirements

  • Minimum of 3 posts (1 initial & 2 follow-up)
  • Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)
  • APA format for in-text citations and list of references

 

 

Solution

Week 4 Discussion: Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

There are two types of reasoning, inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is the kind of reasoning that takes specific information and draws wider generalization that is considered probable but may not be guaranteed 100% (Wanko, 2017). Thus, inductive reasoning may be described as making an informed or educated guess from the available data and/ or information. Even though inductive reasoning might sound right, it might not be right. An example of inductive reasoning is:…………………please follow the link below to purchase the solution at $5