[Answered] NR305 Week 4 Discussion: Debriefing of Week 3 iHuman Cardiovascular Assessment

Directions

  • Debriefing is an activity that involves thinking critically about your own experiences related to the virtual simulation you completed. Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.
  • Scholarly sources are NOT required for this reflection
Debriefing

Use the following format to reflect on the Week 3 iHuman Cardiovascular assignment. This was the Michael Granger case.

  • Paragraph One: What went well for you in the simulation? Provide examples of when you felt knowledgeable and confident in your skills. Do you feel the scenario was realistic? Why or why not?
  • Paragraph Two: What would you do differently next time? Describe at least one area you identified where improvements could be made. Were you surprised by any of the feedback you were provided by iHuman? If yes, please explain.
  • Paragraph Three: What did you learn from this simulation? Or, what did this simulation reinforce that you found valuable? Do you have any questions related to the scenario?

 

 

Solution

Week 4 Discussion: Debriefing of Week 3 iHuman Cardiovascular Assessment

I was acquainted with individuals with heart failure which wound up in the medical facility. In the ICU numerous people will end up there thanks to non-compliance of medical attention. I’m accustomed to diuresing an individual, I was worried about the potassium level of his following the Lasix but that didn’t come up. I had also been positive on training the affected person, and…………………please follow the link below to purchase the solution at $5