PHI-413V – Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative
This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles and four boxes approach.
Based on the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and other required topic study materials, you will complete the “Applying the Four Principles: Case Study” document that includes the following:
Part 1: Chart
This chart will formalize the four principles and four boxes approach and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.
Part 2: Evaluation
This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.
Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
SOLUTION
| Medical Indications
Beneficence and Nonmaleficence |
| According to Beauchamp and Childress (2019), beneficence is an act done to benefit others. It entails actions done out of mercy and kindness. The medical indications reveal that James suffered from acute glomerulonephritis which was a result of strep infection. The physician in this case study acts in beneficence when he accurately diagnoses the problem and advises the parents to carry out dialysis. Non-maleficence is the moral authority over oneself not to harm a patient. The physician does this when he advises the patient on the right steps to take to prevent further damage to James’s health. |
………..please follow the link below to purchase the solution at $10
